A.D. 827.
EMPERORS OF THE EAST. EMPEROR OF THE WEST.
Leo VI (the Armenian), 813-820. Louis I the Pious,
814-840.
Michael II (the Stammerer),
820-829.
As the period of the vacancy of the Holy See on the death
of Eugenius is nowhere stated by our authorities, it can only be laid down as
probable that Valentine was elected soon after the death of his predecessor.
He was of that city which, his biographer proudly
notes, “holds the dignity of the chief priesthood and of the royal power”, and
came of noble and pious parents. His father’s name is given as Leontius, and
the place of his birth as the region of the Via Lata,
at this time the aristocratic quarter of Rome. From his earliest years he gave
every sign of a good heart, and of an extraordinary ability. The vain and
wicked pleasures of the young nobles were shunned by him. But, under skilled
masters, he devoted himself to the acquisition of sacred and profane learning.
The beautifying effect of this training on his mind showed itself in his words
and works.
Pope Paschal, moved by the fame of the youth’s
excellent character, brought him from the school attached to the Lateran
palace, ordained him subdeacon, and kept him near
him. On account of his conspicuous qualities of mind, heart, and person, he
entertained a more than ordinary regard for him, and finally made him
archdeacon of the Roman Church. Valentine found the same favor in the eyes of
Eugenius, who treated him as his own son.
On the death of the last-named Pontiff, there gathered
together in the Lateran “the venerables bishops, the
glorious nobles, and all the people of the city”. With one accord they cried
out, “Valentine, the most holy archdeacon, is worthy of the Apostolic See;
Valentine must be made Pope!” All then hurried off to the Church of St. Mary
Major, where they found the object of their search in prayer. No notice was
taken of his long and earnest declarations that he was utterly unworthy of so
great a dignity. He was declared duly elected.
Then, in reversion of the usual order, as had also
happened in the case of Benedict III, he was enthroned before he was
consecrated. For we are told that, with every manifestation of joy and honor,
Valentine was escorted to the Lateran palace and seated on the pontifical throne.
His feet were duly kissed “by the whole Roman senate”, and early on the first suitable
day he was consecrated in St. Peter’s. As no mention is made of the presence of
the imperial missi,
it may be presumed that they were not there. After the consecration was over,
the Pope gave a splendid banquet and presents to the whole electoral body.
The election of Valentine was another triumph for the nobility.
Not only did they secure the nomination of one pontifical of their own body,
but it is again recorded that they themselves took part in the election. By the
decree of the Roman Council of 769, under Stephen (III) IV, it had been
definitely laid down that the choice of the Pope was to be in the hands of the
clergy alone, that anyone who opposed their rights in this matter was to be anathematized,
and that only after he had been chosen and enthroned were the nobility and the
rest of the laity to come to salute him “as the lord of all”. But now we see “the
party of the nobles gaining the upper hand” and once
more claiming a voice in the election of the popes. Even if they did not secure
their point in the time of Eugenius II, they certainly did in the days of
Nicholas I. The share they secured in the ninth century became the
preponderating one in the tenth. And the way in which they then exercised their
sway was the best justification for their being finally deprived, in the
eleventh century, of all the position they had secured.
Unfortunately the prosperous reign that might
have been looked for after such a promising beginning was destined never to be realized.
By a precious death, Valentine went to meet his Lord after a reign of from
thirty to forty days.