CHAPTER
IV
THE
ALBIGENSIAN CRUSADE.
17
THE TREATY OF PARIS, IN 1329.
Gregory
IX was quite content thus to close the war which Innocent had commenced
twenty years before. Already, in March, 1228, he wrote to Louis IX, urging
him to make peace according to the judgment of the legate, Cardinal Romano,
who had full powers in the premises, and it was in the name of the legate
that the first overtures were made to Raymond through the Abbot of Grandselve.
That the marriage was the pivot upon which from the beginning the negotiations turned is
shown by another letter of June 25, authorizing Romano to dispense with the
impediment of consanguinity if the union between Jeanne and one of the king's brothers would lead to peace. Another epistle of October 21,
announcing to all the prelates of France that he had renewed the indulgences
for a crusade against the Albigenses, would seem to show that the terms offered
to Raymond were hard of acceptance, and that renewed pressure on him was
necessary. This was enforced by extensive devastations in his territories, and
in December, 1228, he gave the abbot full power to assent to whatever might be
agreed upon by Thibaut of Champagne, who acted as mediator for him. A
conference was held at Meaux, where we find the consuls of Toulouse also
represented, and preliminaries were signed in January, 1229. Finally, on Holy
Thursday, April 12, 1229, the long war came to an end. Before the portal of
Notre Dame de Paris Raymond humbly approached the legate and begged for
reconciliation to the Church: barefooted and in his
shirt he was conducted to the altar as a penitent, received absolution in the
presence of the dignitaries of Church and State, and his followers were
relieved from excommunication. After this he constituted himself a prisoner in
the Louvre until his daughter and five of his castles should be in the hands of
the king, and five hundred toises of the walls of Toulouse should be
demolished.
The
terms to which he had agreed were hard and humiliating. In the royal
proclamation of the treaty, he is represented as acting at the command of the
legate, and humbly praying Church and king for mercy and not for justice. He
swore to persecute heresy with his whole strength, including heretics and
believers, their protectors and receivers, and not sparing his nearest kindred,
friends, and vassals. On all these speedy punishment was to be inflicted, and
an inquisition for their detection was to be instituted in such form as the
legate might dictate, while in its aid Raymond agreed to offer the large reward
of two marks per head for every manifest ("perfected") heretic
captured during two years, and one mark forever thereafter. As for other
heretics, believers, receivers, and defenders, he agreed to do whatever the
legate or pope should command. His baillis, or local officers, moreover, were to be good Catholics, free of all suspicion. He was to defend
the Church and all its members and privileges; to enforce its censures by
seizing the property of all who should remain for a year under
excommunication; to restore all church lands and lands of ecclesiastics
occupied since the commencement of the troubles, and to pay as damages for
personal property taken the sum of ten thousand silver marks; to enforce for
the future the payment of tithes, and, as a special fine, to pay five thousand
marks to five religious houses named, besides six thousand marks to be
expended in fortifying certain strongholds to be held by the king as security
for the Church, and between three thousand and four thousand marks to support
for ten years at Toulouse two masters in theology, two decretalists, and six
masters in grammar and the liberal arts. Moreover, as penance, he agreed to
assume the cross immediately on receiving absolution, and to proceed within two
years to Palestine, to serve there for five years—a penance which he never
performed, though repeatedly summoned to do so, until in 1247 he made
preparations for a departure which was arrested by death. An oath was further
to be administered to his people, renewable every five years, binding them to
make active war upon all heretics, their believers, receivers, and fautors, and
to help the Church and king in subduing heresy.
The
interests of the Church and of religion being thus provided for, the marriage
of Jeanne with one of the king's brothers was treated as a favor bestowed on
Raymond. It was tacitly assumed that all his dominions had been forfeited, and
the king graciously granted him all the lands comprised within the ancient
bishopric of Toulouse, subject to their reversion after his death to his
daughter and her husband, in such wise that whether there was issue of the
marriage or not, or whether she survived her husband or not, they passed
irrevocably to the royal family. Agen, Rouergue, Quercy, except Cahors, and
part of Albi were likewise granted to Raymond, with reversion to his daughter
in default of lawful heirs; but the king retained the extensive territories comprised
within the duchy of Narbonne and the counties of Velay, Gévaudan, Viviers,
and Lodève. The marquisate of Provence, beyond the Rhône, a dependency of the
empire, was given to the Church. Raymond thus lost two thirds of his vast
dominions.
In
addition to this he was obliged to destroy the fortifications of Toulouse and
of thirty other strongholds, and was prohibited from strengthening any in their
stead; he was to deliver to the king eight other specified places for ten
years, and to pay fifteen hundred marks per annum for five years for their maintenance;
and he was to take active measures to reduce to subjection any recalcitrant
vassals, especially the Count of Foix, who, being thus abandoned, came in the
same year and made a humiliating peace. A general amnesty was proclaimed, and
the "faidits", or ejected knights and gentlemen, were restored,
excluding, of course, all who were heretics. Raymond, moreover, engaged to
maintain peace throughout the land, and the routlers, or bancht mercenaries, who for fifty
years had been the special objects of animadversion by the Church, were to be
expelled forever. To all these conditions his vassals and people were to be
sworn, obligating themselves to assist him in the performance; and if, after
forty days' notice, he continued derelict on any point, all the lands granted
him reverted to the king, his subjects' allegiance was transferred, and he fell
back into his present condition of an excommunicate.
The king's assumed right
to the territories thus disposed of arose partly from the conquests of his father,
and partly from Amauri, who a few days later executed a third cession of all
his claims without reserve or consideration, other than what the king in his
bounty might see fit to grant. The reward he obtained was the reversion of the
dignity of Constable of France, which fell in the next year on the death of
Matthieu de Montmorency. In 1237 he foolishly revived his claims, again styled
himself Duke of Narbonne, made an unsuccessful effort to seize Dauphiné in
right of his wife, and invaded the county of Melgueil, thereby incurring the
wath of Gregory IX, who ordered him as a penance to join the crusade then
preparing to start for the Holy Land. In effect he did so, and Gregory
generously granted him, to be paid after he was beyond seas, the large sum of
three thousand marks out of the fund arising from the redemption of their vows
by Crusaders staying at home—by this time a customary mode of selling indulgences, and one exceedingly lucrative, for this payment was assigned simply on
the province of Sens and the lands of Amauri himself. In 1238 he sailed, and
his customary ill-luck pursued him, for in 1241 we hear of him as a prisoner
of the Saracens, and Gregory again came to his aid by contributing to his
ransom four thousand marks from the same redemption fund. His death occurred
the same year at Otranto, on his return from Palestine, thus closing a life of
strange vicissitudes and almost uninterrupted misfortune.
The
house of Toulouse was thus reduced from the position of the most powerful
feudatory, with possessions greater than those of the crown, to a condition in
which it was to be no longer dreaded, though Gregory IX and Frederic II, in
1234, at the reiterated request of Louis I, restored to it the Marquisate of
Provence, probably as a reward for increased zeal in persecution. Raymond no
longer, as Duke of Narbonne, held the first rank among the six lay peers of
France, but was relegated to the fourth place. The treaty resulted as its
framers intended. In 1229 Jeanne of Toulouse and her destined husband Alphonse,
brother of Louis, were children in their ninth year. Their marriage was
deferred until 1237, and when Raymond, in 1249, closed his unquiet career,
they succeeded to his territories. They both died without issue in 1271, when Philip
III took possession, not only of the county of Toulouse, as provided for in
the settlement, but also of the other possessions which Jeanne had vainly
attempted to dispose of by will, thus rendering the crown supreme throughout
southern France, and preparing it for the rude shocks of the wars with Edward
III and Henry V. It is fairly questionable, indeed, whether, during those
convulsions, the house of Toulouse might not have become independently royal,
governing a well-defined territory of homogeneous population, had not the
religious enthusiasm excited by heresy enabled the Capets, with the assistance
of the papacy, to destroy it in the thirteenth century.
That
a monarchy so distracted and weakened as that of France during the minority of
Louis IX could demand and exact terms so humiliating as those which Raymond
was glad to accept, shows the helpless isolation to which the religious
question had reduced him, despite the fidelity of his subjects and the repeated
failure of the assaults upon him. Those assaults he had met with the courage
of a gallant knight and the resources of a skilful leader, but his neglect to
persecute heresy deprived him of sympathy and of allies, and the anathema of
the Church hung over him as an ever-present curse. To the public law of the
period he was an outlaw, without even the right of self-defence against the
first-comer, for his very self-defence was rated among his crimes; in the popular
faith of the age he was an accursed thing, without hope, here or hereafter.
The only way of readmission into human fellowship, the only hope of salvation,
lay in reconciliation with the Church through the removal of the awful ban
which had formed part of his inlieritance. To obtain this he had repeatedly
offered to sacrifice his honor and his subjects, and the offer had been
contemptuously spurned. Now that the necessities of the royal court had
rendered the regent and her counsellors unwilling to risk the drain and the
dangers of prolonged war, he was too eager to escape from his cruel position
to hesitate long in accepting the hard conditions which were exacted of him,
although, as Bernard Gui says, the single provision which assured the
reversion of Toulouse to the royal house would have been sufficiently hard if
the king had captured Count Raymond on a stricken field.'
There
was much that he could allege in justification, had he imagined that
justification was needed. Born in 1197, he was yet a child when the storm had
broken over his father's head. Ever since he could observe and reason he had
seen his land the prey of the ruthless chivalry of the North, at the head of a vagabond hordes, as eager for
spoil as for the redemption of their sins. As soon as one host had melted away
it had been succeeded by another, and for twenty years the wretched people
who clung to him had known no peace. He and they had barely escaped as by
a
miracle from destruction in the last crusade, and there was no prospect of better
days in the future, so long as Rome's implacable emnity to heresy, acting upon
the ambition of the restless Franks, could always call forth fresh swarms of
marauders and dignify them with the Cross. Though he could not be a fervent
disciple of a Church which had been to him so stern a stepmother, he was yet
no Catharan; and while perfectly ready to tolerate the heresy of a large
portion of his subjects, he might well ask himself whether their toleration was
to be purchased at the cost of the whole population, who could never look for
peace so long as heresy was endured among them. The choice lay between
sacrificing one side or both sides; and what well might seem the lesser evil
coincided with his own selfish instincts of self-preservation. He never hesitated
as to the choice; and, after he had accomphshed his object, he faitlifully
adhered to his promise of uprooting heresy, though more than once he interfered
when the excessive rigor of the Inquisition threatened trouble. Perhaps the
task at first was a distasteful one, but he had no alternative. He was but a
man of his time; had he been more he might have played a martyr's part without
better securing the happiness of his people.
The
battle of toleration against persecution had been fought and lost; nor, with
such a warning as the fate of the two Raymonds, was there risk that other
potentates would disregard the public opinion of Christendom by ill-advised
mercy to the heretic. Calling upon the state for its assured support, the
Church made haste to reap the fruits of victory, and the Inquisition was soon
at work among those who had so long bidden her defiance. That this was
unanimously regarded by Europe as necessary and righteous, in spite of the
vices and corruption of the ecclesiastical body, is so strange a development of
the religion of Christ as to render the process of its evolution an
indispensable subject for our consideration.